Heart of Darkness Imperialism, Hegemony, and Othering

Narrative of Thought I remember when I first read Heart of Darkness. I was a sophomore in high school when I had been required to read it. I remember when I got it. I thought to myself that it might be a cool book. I read the first five pages and wanted to throw it the window. It was confusing, frustrating and a little weird. Eventually I did read it. The more I read the more it made sense. When I finished it, I was still a little confused, but I understood it better. I would not say that the exact word imperialism came to my mind when I thought about Heart of Darkness. Granted back then I did not really understand the word imperialism. I did know that I was repulsed by what the Europeans were really doing in the Congo. I just did not†¦show more content†¦Besides that, they had given them [Africans] every week three pieces of brass wire, each about nine inches long†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (178). Marlow then talks about how useless it was; unless they planned to actually eat the wire or bend it into fishhooks, they would have no food. He later ponders why, the cannibals, do not attack. After all, they threw the hippo meat overboard because of greed and selfishness. Indeed, the cannibals were in some ways more civil than the pilgrims. They could have killed the pilgrims anytime they wanted. However, they seemed to have a secret humanity in them. Perhaps it was because they were not corrupted by greed or power. This says a lot about the Europeans. T hrough out the novel, the European’s attitude constantly reminds us that if there is something for them to gain from, then they do not care who they trample on to get to it. Another example for imperialism is â€Å"Shooting an Elephant†, but there is also evidence that there is othering and hegemony. However, the story mostly centers on hegemony. In â€Å"Shooting an Elephant†, the narrator was pressured to shoot the elephant in order to be accepted by the natives. Orwell did not want to shoot the elephant but felt pressured to in order to maintain his rank of power and respect. Orwell ends up shooting the elephant because he does not want to lose even more respect and look idiotic. If he had not killed the elephant, but simply walked away, he wouldShow MoreRelatedAnalysis Of S Americanah Through A Post Colonial Prism4297 Words   |  18 Pagesnationally allegorical (69), an assertion spectacularly assailed by Aijaz Ahmad (77-82). But it is possible to close our eyes to Ahmad’s very valid misgivings and take a bird’s eye view of Jameson’s assertion: read in reaction to the phenomenon of imperialism, perhaps the literature of dominated peoples is the literature of self-assertion, however blind to Jameson’s national allegorical (or anticolonial) imperative, and however â€Å"hybrid†. That last expression might as well be a fair summation of post-colonialismRead MoreThe White Man s Burden By Rudyard Kipling10612 Words   |  43 Pagesattached to analyse the text. Having an eye on these approaches, this section offers a critical thinking about the nature of the relationship between the British and the Indians. 2.1 The Indian Landscape and the Sense of Displacement As in Heart of Darkness, the Indian landscape appears very hostile to the colonisers as if it conspires and plots against them. It depicts their socio-psychological dilemma in the foreign land and the traumatic influences of their colonial system. It resists and fightsRead MoreA Passage Of India And The Relations Of Power10531 Words   |  43 Pagesduring the tension between the Indians and the British during the British Occupation of Indi. It underlines the problematic relationship of the British colonial context and the colonised Indians. The relationship between the two nations is that of hegemony and power. India, as Ahmad Abu Baker believes in his â€Å"Rethinking Identity: The Coloniser in E. M. Forster’s A Passage to India†, is very ‘hostile to the colonisers, fighting them and intensifying their feelings of alienation and exile’ (Abu Baker

Gender Disparities An Examination On Why Bread Winners...

Gendered Disparities; An Examination on Why Bread-Winners Suck In the fall of 2009, Alison Jaggar wrote a paper detailing the struggles that females face in society titled â€Å"Transitional Cycles of Gendered Vulnerability; A Prologue to a Theory of Gendered Global Justice.† After reading and analyzing her work, I would like to counter-argue against her denial that the effects that typical family roles play in society, specifically in regards to the upper and middle class; that men should be the breadwinners and women should be the caregivers. We live in a world where all different types of people face injustice and receive less opportunity in the workforce because of the way that society is set up. Since before we even immigrated to the New World, men have been the workers, whereas women have been domesticated. Today, if a wife were to be divorced from her spouse, she would not have as much working experience as her husband, because she had played the domestic role at home; taking care of children, cleaning, keeping bills on track, etc. It’s due to this that women rarely get a taste of what it’s like to work in some of the higher paying jobs. Furthermore, in a typical family role, men go on to make the money of the house, the children are educated and told to pursue their careers. However, when discussing children’s family roles, the son typically goes on to be the scholar and to seek the higher paying job that could be offered to him, whereas the woman is encouraged to pursue

Information System in Accounting Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Information System in Accounting. Answer: Application of Information System in Accounting Accounting Information system refers to a tool which collects, processes, store and distributes accounting information which can then be used to take financial decisions, forecasting and investment decisions. Accounting Information Systems generally utilizes computer appliances to run and function effectively (Hall 2012). Nowadays Accounting Information System have really become popular in business and most of the businesses utilizes such a system. The system depends on the nature of the business, volume of transactions taking place, organizational structure of the company and other similar factors. Generally, businesses use Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems, Integrated Packages of Computer programs, System software like tally, excel, Cloud Computing. Impacts on Accounting Practices As the traditional method of recording transaction are no longer in much use, the new information systems in accounting have positive impacts on the whole accounting process. The most basic impact is that the it has simplified the whole of accounting process (Sajady, Dastgir and Nejad 2012). With the change of one entry all the necessary changes happen automatically in case of accounting information system such as ERP and other computer system software. Moreover, with the introduction of information systems in accounting procedures there has been an ease in operations where most of the critical work are done by the system and software and the results can then be printed out. In addition to this there is accuracy in the calculations provided the inputs are correct and there is no omission. In order to fully take advantage of such new software and system, accounting professional needs to have adequate knowledge of the software or system which they are or will operate. Therefore, accoun ting professionals needs to train themselves in information systems which is used by the company. Moreover, accounting professionals needs to have full knowledge of the system they are operating in order to solve any problems which may arise and get the desired results. References Hall, J.A., 2012.Accounting information systems. Cengage Learning. Sajady, H., Dastgir, M. and Nejad, H.H., 2012. Evaluation of the effectiveness of accounting information systems.International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM),6(2), pp.49-59.

Criminal Law. R V Blaue free essay sample

The defendant inflicted serious stab wounds on the deceased who, knowing she would be likely to die as a result, refused a blood transfusion because she was a Jehovahs Witness and accepting anothers blood was against her religion. The defendant claimed that her refusal to accept the blood transfusion broke the chain of causation between his conduct and her death. Extract There have been two cases in recent years which have some bearing on this topic: R v Jordan and R v Smith. In R v Jordan the Court of Criminal Appeal, after conviction, admitted some medical evidence which went to prove that the cause of death was not the blow relied on by the prosecution but abnormal medical treatment after admission to hospital. This case has been criticised but it was probably rightly decided on its facts. Before the abnormal treatment started the injury had almost healed. We share Lord Parker CJs opinion ([1959] 2 All ER at 198, [1959] 2 QB at 43) that R v Jordan should be regarded as a case decided on its own special facts and not as an authority relaxing the common law approach to causation. We will write a custom essay sample on Criminal Law. R V Blaue or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Only if it can be said that the original wounding is merely the setting in which another cause operates can it be said that the death does not result from the wound. Putting it in another way, only if the second cause is so overwhelming as to make the original wound merely part of the history can it be said that death does not flow from the wound. The physical cause of death in [the instant] case was the bleeding into the pleural cavity arising from the penetration of the lung. This had not been brought about by any decision made by the deceased girl but by the stab wound. Counsel for the appellant tried to overcome this line of reasoning by submitting that the jury should have been directed that if they thought the girls decision not to have a blood transfusion was an unreasonable one, then the chain of causation would have been broken. At once the question arises reasonable by whose standards? Those of Jehovahs Witnesses? Humanists? Roman Catholics? Protestants of Anglo-Saxon descent? The man on the Clapham omnibus? But he might well be an admirer of Eleazar who suffered death rather than eat the flesh of swinef or of Sir Thomas Moore who, unlike nearly all his contemporaries, was unwilling to accept Henry VIII as Head of the Church in England. Those brought up in the Hebraic and Christian traditions would probably be reluctant to accept that these martyrs caused their own deaths. As was pointed out to counsel for the appellant in the course of argument, two cases, each raising the same issue of reasonableness because of religious beliefs, could produce different verdicts depending on where the cases were tried. A jury drawn from Preston, sometimes said to be the most Catholic town in England, might have different views about martyrdom to one drawn from the inner suburbs of London. Counsel for the appellant accepted that this might be so; it was, he said, inherent in trial by jury. It is not inherent in the common law as expounded by Sir Matthew Hale and Maule J. It has long been the policy of the law that those who use violence on other people must take their victims as they find them. This in our judgment means the whole man, not just the physical man. It does not lie in the mouth of the assailant to say that his victims religious beliefs which inhibited him from accepting certain kinds of treatment were unreasonable. The question for decision is what caused her death. The answer is the stab wound. The fact that the victim refused to stop this end coming about did not break the causal connection between the act and death. If a victims personal representatives claim compensation for his death the concept of foreseeability can operate in favour of the wrongdoer in the ssessment of such compensation; the wrong doer is entitled to expect his victim to mitigate his damage by accepting treatment of a normal kind: see Steele v R George amp; Co Ltd. As counsel for the Crown pointed out, the criminal law is concerned with the maintenance of law and order and the protection of the public generally. A policy of the common law applicable to the settlement of tortious liability between subjects may not be, and in our judgment is not, appropriat e for the criminal law. The issue of the cause of death in a trial for either murder or manslaughter is one of fact for the jury to decide. But if, as in this case, there is no conflict of evidence and all the jury has to do is to apply the law to the admitted facts, the judge is entitled to tell the jury what the result of that application will be. In this case the judge would have been entitled to have told the jury that the appellants stab wound was an operative cause of death.